Isradipine (isradipine)
Calcium Channel Blockers Oral Capsule
Last reviewed · Source: First Databank (FDB) drug data
Overview
Isradipine is a 1,4-dihydropyridine-derivative calcium-channel blocking agent (calcium-channel blocker).
Isradipine is a 1,4-dihydropyridine-derivative calcium-channel blocking agent that is structurally related to felodipine and nifedipine. Isradipine has pharmacologic actions similar to those of other dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocking agents (e.g., felodipine, nifedipine). The principal physiologic action of isradipine is to inhibit the transmembrane influx of extracellular calcium ions across the membranes of myocardial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells.
Isradipine is a peripheral arterial vasodilator; the drug acts directly on vascular smooth muscle, causing reductions in peripheral vascular resistance (afterload) and blood pressure. The effects of isradipine are more selective to vascular smooth muscle than cardiac muscle.
Following oral administration, 90-95% of isradipine is absorbed; peak plasma concentrations are attained in about 1.5 hours. The low oral bioavailability of isradipine (approximately 15-24%) is due to extensive first-pass metabolism. When the drug is administered with food, time to peak plasma concentration is increased by about 1 hour; however, no effect on AUC is observed.
After a single dose, a reduction in supine and standing blood pressure occurs within 2-3 hours; during chronic administration of twice daily dosing, over 50% of the peak blood pressure effect remains at trough prior to the next dose. Isradipine plasma protein binding is 95%; the drug crosses the placenta, but it is not known whether it is distributed into human milk. Isradipine is completely metabolized in the liver to inactive metabolites; approximately 60-65% is excreted in urine and 25-30% in feces.
Isradipine elimination is biphasic; the initial half-life is 1.5-2 hours and terminal elimination half-life is approximately 8 hours. Peak plasma concentration and AUC are increased by 32 and 52%, respectively, in patients with hepatic impairment. In patients with mild renal impairment (creatinine clearance 30-80 mL/minute), AUC is increased by 45%; however, in patients with severe renal failure (creatinine clearance <10 mL/minute) who have been on hemodialysis, AUC is decreased by 20-50%.
Isradipine peak plasma concentration and AUC are increased by 13 and 40%, respectively, in geriatric patients.
USES: This medication is used to treat high blood pressure. Lowering high blood pressure helps prevent strokes, heart attacks, and kidney problems. Isradipine belongs to a class of drugs known as calcium channel blockers.
It works by relaxing blood vessels so blood can flow more easily.
Generic name: isradipine
Pronunciation: (is-RAD-i-peen)
Drug class: Calcium Channel Blockers
Therapeutic class: Cardiovascular Therapy Agents
Reference product & biosimilars
No reference, biosimilar or interchangeable associated with this drug.
Today’s intelligence on Isradipine
Indications
The following indications are listed for Isradipine:
- Hypertension
Also known as: Elevated Blood Pressure, Essential Hypertension, Hyperpiesia, Hyperpiesis, Hypertensive Disorder, Systemic Arterial Hypertension.
Dosing
No dosing information is available for this tab.
Isradipine is administered orally. Administration of isradipine conventional capsules with food decreases the rate (e.g., delaying peak plasma concentrations by about 1 hour) but not extent of absorption.
Store capsules at 20-25degreesC in a tight, light-resistant container.
| Drug label | Dosing type | Instructions |
|---|---|---|
| Isradipine 2.5 Mg Capsule | Maintenance | Take 1 capsule (2.5 mg) by oral route 2 times per day. |
| Drug label | Dosing type | Instructions |
|---|---|---|
| Isradipine 2.5 Mg Capsule | Maintenance | Take 1 capsule (2.5 mg) by oral route 2 times per day. |
Drug interactions
There is no enhanced messaging for this drug.
There are no contraindication interactions for this drug.
Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
Agents That Affect Catecholamines/Iobenguane I 131
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Many compounds that reduce catecholamine uptake or that deplete catecholamine stores may interfere with iobenguane uptake into cells.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Compounds that reduce catecholamine uptake or that deplete catecholamine stores may impact the dosimetry calculations or effectiveness of iobenguane.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Discuss the use of agents that affect catecholamines. Discontinue drugs that reduce catecholamine uptake or deplete catecholamine stores for at least 5 half-lives before administration of either the dosimetry or a therapeutic dose of iobenguane. Do not administer these drugs until at least 7 days after each iobenguane dose.(1)
DISCUSSION: Many agents may reduce catecholamine uptake or deplete catecholamine stores.(1) Examples include: - CNS stimulants or amphetamines (e.g. cocaine, methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine) - norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (e.g. phentermine) - norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g. tramadol) - monoamine oxidase inhibitors (e.g. phenelzine, linezolid) - central monoamine depleting drugs (e.g. reserpine) - non-select beta adrenergic blocking drugs (e.g. labetalol) - alpha agonists or alpha/beta agonists (e.g. pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine, ephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, naphazoline) - tricyclic antidepressants or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (e.g. amitriptyline, bupropion, duloxetine, mirtazapine, venlafaxine) - botanicals that may inhibit reuptake of norepinephrine, serotonin or dopamine (e.g. ephedra, ma huang, St. John's Wort, yohimbine) - calcium channel blockers
Calcium Channel Blockers/Dantrolene
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The exact mechanism is unknown. Dantrolene may decrease the release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, resulting in additive or synergistic effects with calcium channel blockers.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of dantrolene and calcium channel blockers may result in cardiogenic shock.(2-4)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The US, UK, and Australian manufacturers of dantrolene state that concurrent use with calcium channel blockers during the management of malignant hyperthermia crisis is not recommended.(2-4) The Australian and UK manufacturers of diltiazem state that concurrent use of dantrolene infusion with calcium channel blockers is contraindicated.(5-6)
DISCUSSION: Cardiogenic shock in patients treated simultaneously with verapamil and dantrolene is rare but has been reported.(2-4,7) Concurrent use of dantrolene and verapamil in swine has been reported to result in cardiogenic shock and hyperkalemia.(8) In dogs, the combination has been reported to cause hyperkalemia.(9) The combination of diltiazem and dantrolene has been reported to cause adverse cardiovascular effects in swine.(10) A study in swine showed no adverse effects from the combination of dantrolene and nifedipine(10) and one patient who experience cardiogenic shock with dantrolene and verapamil had no adverse effects with the combination of dantrolene and nifedipine;(7) however, the US manufacturer cannot endorse the safety of the combination.(2)
Selected Calcium Channel Blockers/Rifamycins
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Multiple mechanisms appear to be involved. Rifampin may increase the hepatic metabolism of the calcium channel blockers, increase first-pass hepatic metabolism of oral calcium channel blockers, and decrease the protein binding of calcium channel blockers.(1-8)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of rifampin may decrease levels and effectiveness of the calcium channel blocker.(1-8)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Observe the patient for a decrease in the therapeutic effects of the calcium channel blocker if rifampin is initiated. The dose of the calcium channel blocker may need to be adjusted if rifampin is initiated or discontinued.(1-7) The US manufacturer of diltiazem states that concurrent use should be avoided.(2) The manufacturer of lercanidipine states that concurrent use is not recommended.(10)
DISCUSSION: In healthy subjects, pretreatment with rifampin (600 mg daily) reduced the concentration of a single dose of isradipine (5 mg) below a detectable level. The study concluded that the concentrations and effects of isradipine may be either reduced or absent as a result of increased isradipine metabolism.(1) Concurrent administration of rifampin has been shown to lower diltiazem levels below detectable limits.(2) In a study in 5 healthy subjects, pretreatment with rifampin (6 days) decreased the area-under-curve (AUC) of a single oral dose of nilvadipine (4 mg) by 96.5%. Pretreatment with rifampin abolished nilvadipine-induced hypotensive effects and tachycardia.(3) A study in six subjects examined the effects of pretreatment with rifampin (600 mg daily for 15 days) on single doses of verapamil (10 mg intravenously or 120 mg orally). Rifampin significantly decreased the maximum concentration (Cmax) and AUC of oral verapamil and resulted in no changes in the P-R interval. There were small decreases in the AUC of intravenous verapamil.(4) In a study in 8 male subjects, pretreatment with rifampin (600 mg daily for 15 days) increased the systemic clearance of S-verapamil by 1.3-fold and the apparent oral-clearance of S-verapamil by 32-fold. The bioavailability of S-verapamil decreased 25-fold. The effect of oral verapamil on AV conduction was almost abolished. No significant changes were noted for intravenous administration of verapamil.(5) In a study in 16 hypertensive chronic kidney disease patients, amlodipine levels decreased an average of 82% after initiation of rifampin. In eight of the 16 patients, the levels were undetectable.(9) There have been case reports of decreased effectiveness of barnidipine,(6) manidipine,(6) nisoldipine,(6) and verapamil(7,8) during concurrent rifampin therapy.
Selected Calcium Channel Blockers/Selected Macrolides
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Some macrolides may inhibit metabolism of calcium channel blockers.(1) In some patients, calcium channel blockers may inhibit the metabolism of the macrolide. Some macrolides have been associated with cardiac arrhythmias, including torsades de pointes.(2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: In some patients, concurrent use may result in elevated levels of and effects from the calcium channel blockers, including hypotension,(2,3) shock,(2) and acute kidney failure.(3) In others, elevated levels of the macrolide may occur, which may increase the risk of sudden death from cardiac causes.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: If possible, avoid the concurrent use of calcium channel blockers with macrolides that inhibit CYP.(1,2) Depending on the infection, azithromycin may be an alternative in patients maintained on calcium channel blockers.(1) If concurrent use is required, monitor patients for and instruct them to report signs of hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, or renal failure.
DISCUSSION: A retrospective review examined sudden cardiac death in Tennessee Medicaid patients. Erythromycin use increased the risk of sudden cardiac death by 1.79-fold. Concurrent use of erythromycin with a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4 (diltiazem, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, troleandomycin, or verapamil) increased the risk of sudden cardiac death by 5.35-fold when compared to patients receiving no antibiotic therapy.(2) In a retrospective review of residents of Ontario, Canada aged 66 or older who were receiving calcium channel blockers, use of clarithromycin and erythromycin were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for hypotension (odds ratio 3.7 and 5.8, respectively). There was no association between use of azithromycin and hospitalization for hypotension.(2) In a retrospective review of residents of Ontario, Canada aged 65 or older who were receiving calcium channel blockers, use of clarithromycin was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization with acute kidney injury when compared to use of azithromycin (0.44% of patients versus 0.22% - odds ratio 1.98). Risk was highest with the use of nifedipine (odds ratio 5.33). Use of clarithromycin was also associated with a higher risk of hospitalization with hypotension (0.12% of patients versus 0.07%, odds ratio 1.60) and all-cause mortality (1.02% of patients versus 0.59%, odds ratio 1.74).(3) In a cross-over study in 12 healthy male subjects, the administration of a single dose of felodipine (10 mg extended-release) after four doses of erythromycin (250 mg) resulted in an increase in felodipine area-under-curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), and half-life by 149%, 127%, and 61%, respectively. Concurrent administration increased dehydrofelodipine AUC, Cmax, and half-life by 92%, 56%, and 93%, respectively, when compared to felodipine administration alone. Concurrent administration of felodipine and erythromycin decreased felodipine M3 metabolite AUC and Cmax concentrations by 41% and 36%, respectively. The extent of the interaction was extremely variable between subjects.(4) In a case report, a 43 year-old female developed palpitations, flushing, ankle edema, and hypotension 2-4 days after the addition of erythromycin to felodipine therapy. Felodipine levels were found to be elevated.(5) In a case report, a 77 year-old male developed shock, heart block, and multi-organ failure two days after the addition of clarithromycin to nifedipine therapy.(6) In a case report, a 76 year-old female developed hypotension, bradycardia, shortness of breath, and weakness two days after the addition of telithromycin to verapamil therapy.(7)
Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
Selected Antihypertensive Agents/Selected Maois
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Both MAOIs and antihypertensive agents may increase the risk of postural hypotension.(1,2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Postural hypotension may occur with concurrent therapy of MAOIs and antihypertensive agents.(1,2)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The manufacturer of phenelzine states all patients should be followed closely for symptoms of postural hypotension. Hypotensive side effects have occurred in patients who have been hypertensive and normotensive, as well as hypotensive at initiation of phenelzine.(1) The manufacturer of tranylcypromine states hypotension has been observed most commonly but not exclusively in patients with pre-existing hypertension. Tranylcypromine doses greater than 30 mg daily have a major side effect of postural hypotension and can lead to syncope. Gradual dose titration is recommended to decrease risk of postural hypotension. Combined use with other agents known to cause hypotension have shown to have additive side effects and should be monitored closely.(2) Monitor the patient for signs and symptoms of postural hypotension including dizziness, lightheadedness, or weakness, especially upon standing. Monitor blood pressure as well as orthostatic vitals and adjust antihypertensive therapy, including decreasing the dose, dividing doses, or scheduling doses at bedtime, as needed to maintain goal blood pressure. If blood pressure remains hypotensive, consider decreasing the dose of phenelzine or tranylcypromine. In some cases, discontinuation of one or both agents may be necessary.(3) Normotensive patients on stable antihypertensive therapy who are started on either phenelzine or tranylcypromine may be at increased risk for hypotension. Hypertensive patients on stable phenelzine or tranylcypromine who require antihypertensive therapy would be at decreased risk for hypotension.
DISCUSSION: A review article describes the pharmacology of phenelzine and tranylcypromine as non-selective MAOIs which inhibit both type A and type B substrates. Orthostatic hypotension is described as the most common MAOI side effect and usually occurs between initiation and the first 3-4 weeks of therapy.(3) In a double-blind study, 71 patients were randomized to receive a 4-week trial of either tranylcypromine, amitriptyline, or the combination. The number of patients reporting dizziness at 4 weeks was not different between the three treatment groups (tranylcypromine 52.4%; amitriptyline 65%; combination 66.7%). Blood pressure (BP) assessment noted a significant drop in standing BP in the tranylcypromine group compared to baseline (systolic BP change = -10 mmHg; p<0.02 and diastolic BP change = -9 mmHg; p<0.02). Combination therapy also had a significant drop in standing BP compared to baseline (systolic BP change = -9 mmHg; p<0.02). Patients receiving amitriptyline had no significant change in BP from baseline at 4 weeks. All three groups had a trend toward increasing orthostatic hypotension in BP changes from lying to standing. The change in orthostatic hypotension was significant in the amitriptyline group with an average systolic BP orthostatic drop of -9 mmHg (p<0.05).(4) A randomized, double-blind study of 16 inpatients with major depressive disorder were treated with either phenelzine or tranylcypromine. Cardiovascular assessments were completed at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. After 6 weeks, 5/7 patients (71%) who received phenelzine had a decrease in standing systolic BP greater than 20 mmHg from baseline. Head-up tilt systolic and diastolic BP decreased from baseline in patients on phenelzine (98/61 mmHg v. 127/65 mmHg, respectively; systolic change p=0.02 and diastolic change p=0.02). After 6 weeks, 6/9 patients (67%) who received tranylcypromine had a decrease in standing systolic BP greater than 20 mmHg from baseline. Head-up tilt systolic and diastolic BP decreased from baseline in patients on tranylcypromine (113/71 mmHg v. 133/69 mmHg, respectively; systolic change p=0.09 and diastolic change p=0.07).(5) Selected MAOIs linked to this monograph include: phenelzine and tranylcypromine. Selected antihypertensive agents include: ACE inhibitors, alpha blockers, ARBs, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, aprocitentan, clonidine, hydralazine, moxonidine, and sparsentan.
Selected Antihypertensives And Vasodilators/Apomorphine
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Apomorphine causes dose-dependent decreases in blood pressure. Concurrent use with antihypertensive agents may result in additive effects on blood pressure.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of antihypertensives and apomorphine may result in orthostatic hypotension with or without dizziness, nausea, or syncope.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk of orthostatic hypotension may be increased during dose escalation of apomorphine and in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.(1)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients receiving concurrent therapy should be monitored for hypotension. Counsel patients about the risk of orthostatic hypotension.(1)
DISCUSSION: Healthy volunteers who took sublingual nitroglycerin (0.4 mg) concomitantly with apomorphine experienced a mean largest decrease in supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 9.7 mm Hg and in supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 9.3 mm Hg, and a mean largest decrease in standing SBP and DBP of 14.3 mm Hg and 13.5 mm Hg, respectively. The maximum decrease in SBP and DBP was 65 mm Hg and 43 mm Hg, respectively. When apomorphine was taken alone, the mean largest decrease in supine SBP and DBP was 6.1 mm Hg and 7.3 mm Hg, respectively, and in standing SBP and DBP was 6.7 mm Hg and 8.4 mm Hg, respectively.(1)
Selected Antihypertensives/Tizanidine
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Tizanidine is an alpha-2 agonist. Concurrent use with antihypertensive agents may result in additive effects on blood pressure.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of antihypertensives and tizanidine may result in hypotension.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients receiving concurrent therapy should be monitored for hypotension. The risk of hypotension may be decreased by careful titration of tizanidine dosages and monitoring for hypotension prior to dose advancement. Counsel patients about the risk of orthostatic hypotension.(1)
DISCUSSION: Severe hypotension has been reported following the addition of tizanidine to existing lisinopril therapy.(2-4)
Selected Calcium Channel Blockers/Cimetidine
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Cimetidine may decrease the metabolism of diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, nisoldipine, and nitrendipine.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The pharmacological effects of the calcium channel blocker may be increased.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Observe the patient for changes in clinical response to the calcium channel blocker when starting or stopping cimetidine. The dosage of the calcium channel blocker may need to be adjusted. Ideally, suggest an alternative H-2 antagonist such as famotidine, nizatidine, or ranitidine.
DISCUSSION: Significant effects have been observed during concurrent administration of nifedipine or felodipine with cimetidine. During combined administration of nifedipine and cimetidine in six healthy volunteers, the area-under-curve (AUC) of nifedipine was increased by 80% compared to nifedipine alone. Increased heart rate and a drop in mean arterial pressure 14 mmHg were also reported. Ranitidine showed only a nonsignificant 25% rise in peak plasma levels of nifedipine and no effects on blood pressure. Similar results were reported in another study where concurrent administration of felodipine and cimetidine resulted in an increase in felodipine AUC and maximum concentration (Cmax) by 50%. Concurrent administration of cimetidine has also been shown to increase the AUC and Cmax of diltiazem by 53% and 58%, respectively. The manufacturers of isradipine and nicardipine recommend carefully monitoring patients receiving concurrent therapy with cimetidine. The manufacturer of isradipine states that concurrent therapy with cimetidine has been shown to increase the AUC of isradipine by 50%. The manufacturer of nifedipine states that careful titration is necessary in patients receiving concurrent therapy. The manufacturers of felodipine and diltiazem state that dosage adjustments may be necessary in patients receiving concurrent therapy. Ranitidine has much less affinity for CYP metabolism than cimetidine and would therefore be expected to have less of an effect on calcium channel blocker metabolism. Studies have shown that nizatidine and famotidine do not inhibit CYP3A4 metabolism.
Contraindications
*Known hypersensitivity to isradipine or any ingredient in the formulation.
There are no contraindication contraindications for this drug.
There are no severe contraindications for this drug.
- Chronic heart failure
- Disease of liver
- Hypotension
Adverse reactions
Common adverse effects reported in patients treated with isradipine include headache, dizziness, peripheral edema, palpitations, fatigue, flushing, and chest pain.
Less Frequent
- Allergic dermatitis
- Angina
- Palpitations
- Peripheral edema
- Skin rash
- Tachycardia
Rare or Very Rare
- Chronic heart failure
- Dyspnea
- Pulmonary edema
- Severe hypotension
More Frequent
- Headache disorder
Less Frequent
- Diarrhea
- Dizziness
- Fatigue
- Flushing
- Nausea
Rare or Very Rare
- Abdominal pain with cramps
- Constipation
- General weakness
- Vomiting
Precautions
No enhanced messaging available.
Although safety and efficacy remain to be fully established in children younger than 18 years of age, some experts have recommended pediatric dosages for hypertension based on clinical experience.
There are no adequate and controlled studies to date with isradipine in pregnant women. When administered to a small number of women being treated for hypertension in pregnancy, isradipine was found to cross the placenta; however, the drug concentration in fetal plasma was considerably lower compared to maternal levels at delivery.
Isradipine should be used during pregnancy only when the potential benefits justify the possible risks to the fetus.
Isradipine has produced maternotoxicity (reduced maternal weight gain) and reductions in birthweight and pup survival during reproductive studies in rats given an oral isradipine dosage of 20 and 60 mg/kg daily (50 and 150 times the maximum recommended human dosage, respectively) during the perinatal and postnatal period. In studies in pregnant rats receiving isradipine during organogenesis, dosages of 60 mg/kg daily impaired maternal weight gain but had no lasting effect on dams or offspring. The drug has produced maternotoxicity (reduced maternal weight gain) and increased fetal resorption during reproductive studies in rabbits given oral isradipine dosages of 3-10 mg/kg daily (7.5-25 times the maximum recommended human dosage).
It is not known whether isradipine is distributed in human milk. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions to isradipine in nursing infants, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the woman.
Isradipine peak plasma concentrations and bioavailability are increased in geriatric patients, however, the manufacturer states that therapy with the drug can be initiated with the usual initial adult dosage in such patients.
In geriatric patients, clearance of isradipine is decreased, resulting in 13 and 40% increases in peak plasma concentrations and AUC, respectively. The manufacturer states that therapy with the drug can be initiated with the usual initial adult dosage in such patients.
ICD codes
| Code | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | ||
| I10 | ICD10CM | Essential (primary) hypertension |
| I11 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart disease |
| I11.0 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure |
| I11.9 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure |
| I12 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive chronic kidney disease |
| I12.0 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease |
| I12.9 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease |
| I13 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease |
| I13.0 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease |
| I13.1 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure |
| I13.10 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease |
| I13.11 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, or end stage renal disease |
| I13.2 | ICD10CM | Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, or end stage renal disease |
| I15.1 | ICD10CM | Hypertension secondary to other renal disorders |
| I1A.0 | ICD10CM | Resistant hypertension |
ICD code information from First Databank (FDB).
Formulary status
Search health-plan coverage for this drug by ZIP code.
Choose the first character of a health plan name.
Last reviewed · Source: First Databank (FDB) drug data
On this page
Actions
Sign in to save favorites
Saving this drug requires a free Physicians Office Resource account.